Quickly find freely available drug and population models in our PBPK model repository.
The models provided have been collated from published examples which authors have shared in our Published Model Collection or developed as part of various global health projects in our Global Health Collection. This search facility searches both model collections simultaneously.
To contribute published user compound and/or population files, upload your files here: Upload Model Files
The RES-Simvastatin lactone and RES-Simvastatin acid models within the Simcyp Compound Repository have been developed as substrates of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, BCRP (simvastatin lactone), CES1 (simvastatin lactone) and OATP1B1 (simvastatin acid). Additionally, the models account for the interconversion between the lactone and acid forms in the acidic environment of the stomach. Note: Before running a simulation, modify the population to account for gastric luminalmetabolism. To do this, follow these steps:
This document provides:
https://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/47/11/1291/tab-article-info This workspace was developed to recapitulate the magnitude of drug-drug interaction reported between Rivaroxaban and Verapamil as reported by Greenblatt et al. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29194698/) Note 1: In Table 1 of the publication the Caco-2 Papp (pH 7.4:7.4) was reported as 8 x 10-6 cm/s; however, the Rivaroxaban file in the workspace is using a Caco-2 Papp (pH 7.4:7.4) of 21.8 x 10-6 cm/s. This Papp is in line with the reported scalar in the EXCEL outputs and the Table 1. The obtained Rivaroxaban plasma concentration time profile is in line with the reported Figure 2C in the publication. Note 2: In Table 1 of the publication, input data for Mech KiM are stated; however, the Rivaroxaban file in the workspace is using a User Input for the renal clearance of 3.1 L/h; while the input data for Mech KiM are included in the compound file, they are not activated within the workspace, which is mimicking a DDI with Verapamil and Norverapamil. Note 3: Bile:micelle parameters were changed from 3.4 to 3.5.
Brand Name(s) include: Pyramax
Disease: Malaria
Drug Class: Antimalarials
Date Updated: March 2022
Related files: Artesunate (fixed dose combination – Pyramax)
Absorption Model |
|
Volume of Distribution |
|
Route of Elimination |
|
Perpetrator DDI |
|
Validation |
|
Limitations |
|
Updates in V19 |
|
Brand Name: Invirase (hard gel); Fortovase (soft gel)
Disease: HIV
Drug Class: protease inhibitor
Version: 21
Date Updated: March 2024
Absorption Model |
First order (different absorption parameters for each formulation) |
Volume of Distribution Details |
Minimal PBPK with Vsac and Q (Method 2) |
Route of Elimination |
|
Perpetrator DDI |
|
Validation |
The exposure of 1000mg BID saquinavir with 100 mg BID ritonavir regimen for hard gel were reasonably well recovered (3/3 within 2-fold). With the exception of the 1000 mg BID saquinavir with 100 mg BID ritonavir regimen for soft gel, the exposures of ritonavir-boosted regimens were well recovered (4/5 within 1.5-fold). Ten clinical DDI studies where saquinavir (soft gel) was administered with either ritonavir, cimetidine, ketoconazole, rifampin, erythromycin, or rifabutin were used to verify the PBPK model of saquinavir as a victim. In comparison of predicted vs. observed AUC, 80% of the studies were within 2-fold. Two clinical DDI studies where saquinavir (hard gel) was administered with either ritonavir or nelfinavir were used to verify the PBPK model of saquinavir (hard gel) as a victim. In comparison of predicted vs. observed AUC, 50% of the studies were within 2-fold. Three clinical DDI studies where saquinavir was administered with either midazolam or rifabutin were used to verify the PBPK model of rifabutin (soft gel) as a perpetrator. In comparison of predicted vs. observed AUC, 100% of the studies were within 2-fold. |
Limitations |
|
13 |